On the recordMarch 4, 2013
I opposed the one in 2005 for two reasons. One is that it was bringing down our infrastructure to an artificially low size to meet what I thought was an unacceptable force size.
Source
congress.govI opposed the one in 2005 for two reasons. One is that it was bringing down our infrastructure to an artificially low size to meet what I thought was an unacceptable force size.
Inhofe explains his opposition to the 2005 BRAC round due to infrastructure concerns.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
a free-market approach to conservation. These areas can be developed, but Federal taxpayers do not underwrite the investments.
I am concerned that the Department of Transportation may not award or may unfairly limit future grant funding to eligible projects simply because those projects do not meet the Administration's overarching policy goals.