Let me comment. I was asked the question by the Senator from Pennsylvania as to clarification on this Army Corps of Engineers report. It was the Energy and Water appropriations that made a request of the Corps of Engineers on June 3, 2005. The Corps report states: From the above discussion, the most reasonable option would be to retire the McFarland. It goes on to state: It is expected that sufficient industry hopper dredging capability exists to perform the requirements that may occur on the Delaware River. Finally, it states: McFarland would have to be rehabilitated and repowered at the cost of approximately $20 million. It says that on page 22 of the report. I will go ahead. I ask the Senator from Delaware to take his time and I will elaborate a little bit more on this on my time.
Jim Inhofe: “Let me comment. I was asked the question by the Senator from Pennsylvania as to clarification on this Army Corps of…”
On the recordJuly 18, 2006
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Jim Inhofe
Nov 15, 2022
For 43 years, Ms. Black has served the Nation with honor and professionalism. Now, as she retires from her position as Deputy Director, General and Flag Officer Matters in the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for…
Nov 15, 2022
During Cheryl's time with the Department of Defense, she worked diligently to ensure every general and flag officer recommended for promotion or appointment was thoroughly vetted prior to a nomination being submitted to the Secretary of…
Jul 23, 2023
It is imperative that any TSCA modernization efforts be bipartisan, based on sound science, protective of public health, and continue to allow American industry to lead the world through responsible innovation.





