What that did was take arbitrary political percentages and apply them in order to get votes. We have done far more. This takes into consideration the streamlining provisions about which we haven't even talked. We spent months on this in the committee, as our committee members know. Safety and freight areas have not really been addressed before. This is something of which we can be proud. I have to say, when we put together the charts of all 50 States, there isn't one State that is not treated fairly, doesn't have an increase and doesn't have some kind of logic balancing the donee-donor, balancing the fast-growing States and the low-population States. All these points are considered, and I think it is a very good bill. I agree with all on the committee.
Jim Inhofe: “What that did was take arbitrary political percentages and apply them in order to get votes. We have done far more. This…”
On the recordFebruary 4, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the fairness and provisions of a transportation bill during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
Sep 13, 2022
I am concerned that the Department of Transportation may not award or may unfairly limit future grant funding to eligible projects simply because those projects do not meet the Administration's overarching policy goals.
Sep 6, 2022
I think John Thune did a good job of explaining what a cow tax would do and who that would affect.
Nov 15, 2022
During Cheryl's time with the Department of Defense, she worked diligently to ensure every general and flag officer recommended for promotion or appointment was thoroughly vetted prior to a nomination being submitted to the Secretary of…





