we have discussed the formula, which is what the Senator from Texas has been discussing in the last couple minutes. I want everybody to know, this is 7.25 billion new dollars, new spending under this formula. If you vote for this, you are voting to increase the authorized level by $7.25 billion. If you look at the pending bill, it says: Under the IPAM Program, under section 139 of that title, $2 billion for fiscal year 2004 and nothing thereafter. If you look at the amendment, it says: $2,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 and 2005. . . . That is $4 billion, plus: $1,750,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006, 2007, and 2008. You add it up, and that is $9.25 billion, $7.25 billion more than the pending bill. Everyone has to understand that. When you vote for this, you are voting to increase the spending under this bill.
Jim Inhofe: “we have discussed the formula, which is what the Senator from Texas has been discussing in the last couple minutes. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of a proposed amendment during Senate debate.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
as I reflect on my 28 years serving in the U.S. Senate, I am reminded of the lessons I learned from my former colleagues and friends who have served beside me in the Senate. I had the privilege of serving with many great titans for a…
we have peer competitors in cyberspace and some of them have already hinted that they hold the power to cripple our infrastructure and set back our standard of living if they choose.
today, I honor a superb leader, liaison and warrior. After 2 years of service as Director of the Navy Senate Liaison Office, Chase Patrick is deservedly moving on and assuming the responsibilities of a rear admiral, lower half. I believe…
I want to thank Mr. Johnson for his comments. It has been a mission of love all these years.





