This provision, which was adopted in committee as part of S. 1259, has the unintended effect of raising serious safety concerns for general aviation pilots. It would make it a criminal offense if a pilot knowingly disobeys an order to land, but there is no explicit requirement for reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. It also could make an aircraft owner responsible for paying thousands of dollars to reclaim their aircraft, even if they are totally innocent of any wrongdoing. As the Senator knows, I have been a pilot for over 40 years, and I understand that an 'order to land' could be a dangerous and traumatic experience for a pilot. In fact, the International Standards, Rules of the Air, published by the International Civil Aviation Organization says 'interceptions of civil aircraft are, in all cases, potentially hazardous.' However, because of the potential danger and immense burden to pilots, I believe some relatively minor changes should be made to the amendment.
Jim Inhofe: “This provision, which was adopted in committee as part of S. 1259, has the unintended effect of raising serious safety…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing safety concerns related to an amendment in the Coast Guard authorization bill.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. NDAA
OK. Michal, first of all, it is nice to see you again. It is kind of funny because we have always gotten along famously in spite of the fact that we disagree probably on more things than we have agreed on, but on the other hand, it has…
There is no state that is more dependent upon the issues that are brought in this Committee hearing, and this is the reason I got on it in the first place.
It is no surprise to you that I am going to bring up yours and my favorite subject, and that is the lesser prairie chicken.





