Let me reclaim the floor, if I may, and respond to the Senator from Iowa. For the first 30 years of this program, it was fully funded. I do not believe the Senator was in the Chamber when I first started talking about it. This is a reimbursement back to the States of money they have been deprived of as a result of Federal activity. That is a distinction between this and other programs. For the Senator's State of Iowa, for example, you are getting 20 percent of what you would get if it were fully funded. It is an equity issue. Certainly, I have the understanding from the chairman--and I talked to the Senator from Nevada--and I recognize that when this gets into conference, there is going to be a problem weaving and sorting. But I cannot imagine any other program that would have a higher priority than this, to ultimately say it is our intent to get this fully funded back to where it was prior to the 1980s. For that reason, I believe it has merit above some of the other programs that are coming. This is a reimbursement we agreed to back in the 1950s.
Jim Inhofe: “Let me reclaim the floor, if I may, and respond to the Senator from Iowa. For the first 30 years of this program, it was…”
On the recordJune 27, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the funding and importance of a federal reimbursement program during Senate debate.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
Sep 6, 2022
The Tennessee Valley Authority keeps the lights on for nearly 10 million Americans, and it does so with an all of the above energy approach to power generation.
Nov 16, 2022
I ask unanimous consent that I be recognized for as much time as I shall consume. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Farewell to the Senate
May 26, 2022
today, I honor a superb leader, liaison and warrior. After 2 years of service as Director of the Navy Senate Liaison Office, Chase Patrick is deservedly moving on and assuming the responsibilities of a rear admiral, lower half. I believe…





