It is patently unreasonable, not to say outrageous, for the EPA to insist on seizing expansive power that it admits the statute is not designed to grant.
Jim Inhofe: “It is patently unreasonable, not to say outrageous, for the EPA to insist on seizing expansive power that it admits the…”
Editor's note · Context
Inhofe cites a Supreme Court decision criticizing the EPA's overreach.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
For 43 years, Ms. Black has served the Nation with honor and professionalism. Now, as she retires from her position as Deputy Director, General and Flag Officer Matters in the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for…
During Cheryl's time with the Department of Defense, she worked diligently to ensure every general and flag officer recommended for promotion or appointment was thoroughly vetted prior to a nomination being submitted to the Secretary of…
I want to thank Mr. Johnson for his comments. It has been a mission of love all these years.
A free-market approach to conservation. These areas can be developed, but Federal taxpayers do not underwrite the investments.





