If we had line-item veto, he can support those things he proclaims to support and reject those that he proclaims to reject. But the one thing that was not articulated by the Senator from Indiana is it also makes us more accountable, in that once you veto one item and that item is sent back to the Senate and to the House, it forces those Members to get on record so they can no longer answer their mail saying I was really against all those pork projects but I had to do it for the veterans.
Jim Inhofe: “If we had line-item veto, he can support those things he proclaims to support and reject those that he proclaims to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a line-item veto during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
We are proud to honor the achievements of Ms. Cheryl Black, and on behalf of a grateful nation, we salute her 43 years of service to our great Nation. We offer her our thanks and congratulate her on a well-earned retirement…
We have peer competitors in cyberspace and some of them have already hinted that they hold the power to cripple our infrastructure and set back our standard of living if they choose.
Senators Vitter, Crapo, Alexander, and I sent a letter to Senator Lautenberg yesterday expressing our disappointment that Republicans' sincere effort to work on a bipartisan TSCA reform had been rebuffed.
A free-market approach to conservation. These areas can be developed, but Federal taxpayers do not underwrite the investments.





