I am pleased to bring House Resolution 705 before the House today. It was introduced last week and it is being brought forward with considerable urgency because, Mr. Speaker, while this may not be the first time that we have discussed the issue of competitive trade disadvantage on the floor of the House that U.S. companies are facing, this may be the time that we are most clearly focusing on the contribution to that problem created by the American tax system. The fact that our trade deficit is more than $500 billion demonstrates that the economic engine of American exports has experienced a slowdown. In order for us to revive our economy and to have long-term growth, the substantial trade imbalance that we now are experiencing, 5 percent of our economy, representing our trade deficit, has to be corrected. Congress and the administration need to push our trading partners to adjust the rules to level the playing field for American workers and American companies; and today's resolution helps do that by focusing on the disadvantage actually built into the World Trade Organization rules, a disadvantage imposed upon our Tax Code, allowing our competitors what amounts to a $120 billion advantage over American companies.
Glenn English: “I am pleased to bring House Resolution 705 before the House today. It was introduced last week and it is being brought…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing House Resolution 705 regarding competitive trade disadvantages faced by U.S. companies.
Share
More from Glenn English
can the administration add products to the ISI list as it sees fit without congressional approval and oversight?
I particularly welcome the opportunity to come to the floor and invite my colleagues to support this extension on a bipartisan basis. We have seen partisanship creep into the debate on welfare reform, and I think it has detracted from the…
I believe they have been examined with a fine degree of concern, particularly for their impact on the manufacturing and agricultural sectors. I feel very strongly that what we have here is the best kind of treaty that we can have to expand…
It started out as a partnership. Historically it has been a partnership, and the concern is that that partnership is going to be disturbed.





