My amendment No. 5 simply prohibits funding from being transferred from EQIP, WHIP, GRP, and FRPP to other conservation programs such as CRP and WRP for the purpose of technical assistance. I have been asked on numerous times if CRP, WRP, continuous CRP and CREP sign-ups would still occur if this amendment was passed. It would be up to the USDA to find other funds from which to provide this technical assistance. Mr. Chairman, quite simply put, I think it is a fairness issue. The programs should pay for themselves from their own expenditures.
Frank Lucas: “My amendment No. 5 simply prohibits funding from being transferred from EQIP, WHIP, GRP, and FRPP to other conservation…”
On the recordJuly 13, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to funding for conservation programs.
Share
More from Frank Lucas
Sep 23, 2024
I have no further requests, and I simply note this is a good bill. Let's vote for it. I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Weber of Texas). The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Oklahoma…
Sep 23, 2024
I have no further requests for time, and I am prepared to close once the gentlewoman from California closes.
Sep 11, 2024
Before I yield to my colleague from Michigan, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, this is a process that combines two good pieces of legislation. This is a process that takes what we successfully did in…





