While I claim the time in opposition, I would state for the Record that I support my good friend from Pennsylvania's amendment. I support his efforts to import more integrity into this. What I am afraid of is a duplicative program. More importantly, I support his attempt to make sure that that the program does not affect direct spending. As my good friend has mentioned, his amendment prohibits any direct or mandatory spending. What it does not do, however, is prevent appropriators from adding to our national debt by spending discretionary dollars on the program. While I support my friend's efforts to be truly fiscally responsible, this act should sunset if it is not deficit neutral. Again, I support Mr. Holden's amendment and urge others to do the same. I would prefer language that more directly prevents direct spending, but this is what we have. Mr. Chair, I yield such time as he may consume to the ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, Representative Barton.
On the recordSeptember 16, 2010
Share & report
More from Frank Lucas
Jul 9, 2024
Folks back home are always very concerned about inflation and the period we have gone through lately.
May 14, 2024
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the Senate amendment to the FAA reauthorization bill. As chairman of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, I have worked with my colleagues for over a year on this bill, and I am proud of the…
Jul 9, 2024
the farm bill process has been, always will be, a challenging process, and that the patience of the leadership of the Committee, sometimes is required to a degree that is almost biblical in nature.
Sep 11, 2024
Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Baird), one of my fellow farmers, who understands these issues from the tractor seat and the field.





