I believe this is a deadly amendment. I believe it is a damaging amendment. I think it is an amendment that fails to take stock of reality. Under this bill, your losses must be one of two types: either they must be economic damages, as defined on page 20 of the bill, something that is a financial loss. Everything else is noneconomic damage. If you lose your sight, it is noneconomic damage. If you lose any other organ, your ears, your hearing, it is noneconomic damage. If you lose your arm, if you lose both legs, if you are paralyzed for the rest of your life, it is noneconomic damage. And it is capped; it is treated under the same cap as intangibles such as pain and suffering.
Ernest Istook: “I believe this is a deadly amendment. I believe it is a damaging amendment. I think it is an amendment that fails to…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to damages in a legislative bill.
Share
More from Ernest Istook
Mr. Chairman, I noticed the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Dicks) said that the intent is to make sure that, under the laws that we have passed, there is competition for jobs that are commercial in nature so that Federal employees have the…
I do want to speak against the amendment offered by the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Jefferson). This particular language has been carried in this bill, I understand, for several years. The airport is actually in the district of the…
the provision the gentleman refers to, section 504 of the bill, is one that was crafted, I believe, prior to the recommendation for the Department of Homeland Security being formed. It is certainly my intent, and I will endeavor to make…
Mr. Speaker, were we to adopt this policy of across-the-board raises, we would prevent the ability to prioritize for those people who actually put their lives at risk and put themselves in harm's way. I have worked in local government, I…





