Mr. Chairman, there are always people that do not want to reveal to the public how Washington works or how much people spend on trying to lobby in Washington or anyplace else, especially groups that are dependent upon the taxpayers for their money. Contrary to what several speakers have claimed, there is no distinction made in this simple disclosure legislation between a business and a charity, none whatsoever. It says any organization that receives a Federal grant will make the disclosure. The only exceptions are for individuals and for entities of State, local and tribal government. There is no exemption for big business. There is no exemption for big charity. There is no exemption for big anybody except for government itself. Any group whatsoever, what are they afraid of? What is it they are trying to conceal when they come to us and say, We want the taxpayers' money but we just do not want to tell you how much we spent on lobbying?
Ernest Istook: “Mr. Chairman, there are always people that do not want to reveal to the public how Washington works or how much people…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing transparency in lobbying and disclosure legislation related to federal grants.
Share
More from Ernest Istook
The fact that there may be corporate expatriates in these countries does not mean you should disqualify everybody that is in those countries. If you want to get at corporate expatriates, go after them, but do not say that because, maybe…
Just because people that may do a corporate inversion, may choose to go to these countries does not mean that everybody that is in there is. If you live in a country or in a city where there is a lot of crime, it does not mean that you are…
Despite my great sympathy for the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Hefley), I cannot support it. This particular bill, were it subjected to across-the-board cuts, would find that we have significant cuts and reduction…
I regret that I cannot agree to the amendment, because I know he has devoted a lot of time to it, but for a couple of reasons. One, of course, is that the National Park Service customarily has its appropriations through the Interior…





