I do think it is worth noting to people that not only is this a matter of saying that no relief money is stricken by the Neumann amendment, but because of the language adopted previously in the Gekas amendment, as of October 1 there will be further funding available for FEMA that is guaranteed to make sure that at that time, if there are further disasters occurring, there is money available to FEMA. So advanced funding for disasters that have not happened yet is not necessary because of the Gekas amendment which we already adopted that guarantees funds will be available October 1.
Ernest Istook: “I do think it is worth noting to people that not only is this a matter of saying that no relief money is stricken by the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for FEMA in relation to amendments during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Ernest Istook
Mr. Chairman, I believe this is an amendment that is a wolf in sheep's clothing. We heard from its sponsor that this is supposedly to stop people from being arbitrary; to stop people from setting some arbitrary quota, as they call it. The…
I regret that I cannot agree to the amendment, because I know he has devoted a lot of time to it, but for a couple of reasons. One, of course, is that the National Park Service customarily has its appropriations through the Interior…
we are both very supportive of the media campaign, and we wish for it to continue; but what I want to make sure that we clarify through the colloquy is that despite what may be the concerns that some may have with the language, the intent…
like millions of Americans, I want to pay tribute to President Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States. I have shed many tears this week, because I loved Ronald Reagan, and I know how much he loved this country and the…





