it is never a pleasant task to have to address this Chamber, and those others that are listening in, on something of the gravest import that involves the integrity and the dignity of this body, however a situation has arisen that is very tempting for Members of Congress to attempt to sweep under the rug, to disregard and hope that it will go away. But unfortunately it will not. What I am speaking about is, of course, the scandal that has arisen through the House post office, something that for a long time had been rumored--a couple of years ago Members, many Members, thought that the rumors were untrue because of a task force investigation that seemed to issue a clean bill of health, and then there was a shock wave that came across this particular body last summer, 6 months ago, when the former Postmaster of the U.S. House of Representatives post office pleaded guilty in a sudden appearance in Federal court to three counts of conspiring with Members of Congress to embezzle tens of thousands of dollars of taxpayers' money from the House post office...
Ernest Istook: “it is never a pleasant task to have to address this Chamber, and those others that are listening in, on something of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Speaker Istook addresses the scandal involving the House post office and its implications for Congress.
Share
More from Ernest Istook
Just because people that may do a corporate inversion, may choose to go to these countries does not mean that everybody that is in there is. If you live in a country or in a city where there is a lot of crime, it does not mean that you are…
I reemphasize that this bill is the vehicle for the transportation funding. A vote against this bill is a vote against the transportation funding that is important to every Member.
Mr. Chairman, I think part of the problem with this as part of not being what it is said to be, is that this amendment seeks to outlaw math. It says we cannot adopt a target or a goal for outsourcing jobs if there is a number involved in…
I regret that I cannot agree to the amendment, because I know he has devoted a lot of time to it, but for a couple of reasons. One, of course, is that the National Park Service customarily has its appropriations through the Interior…





