Political Quotes

Ernest Istook: we have had debate previously in this Chamber about the activity of different groups that receive Federal taxpayer's…

On the recordMarch 7, 1996
we have had debate previously in this Chamber about the activity of different groups that receive Federal taxpayer's money, sometimes in hundreds of millions or tens of millions of dollars, and their lobbying activity. Previously this body voted, on two different occasions, passing legislation that would put some commonsense limitations on the scope of lobbying by groups dependent upon the taxpayer's money. The Senate also had a similar vote, adopting that in principle as well. This amendment, however, Mr. Chairman, does not go that far. It simply says that groups that are recipients of taxpayers' money will make a disclosure of the total amount once a year that they have spent on lobbying. That will certainly help both sides in that debate, Mr. Chairman. Some have said oh, they are not doing big time lobbying. Others have said, yes, they are. But the problem is we have never required them to report that, along with the other information grant recipients report. This will give us the information so that both sides may consider this issue based upon the facts. I urge its adoption.
Said by
Ernest Istook
Oklahoma

Editor's note · Context

Discussing lobbying disclosure requirements for groups receiving federal funding.

Share

More from Ernest Istook

Jul 23, 2002

to answer the questions posed by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Serrano), yes, I think we can definitely work together to address his concerns about postal service in the Bronx. The gentleman is correct that we have included report…

govinfo.gov
Sep 22, 2004

I very much appreciate the frustration of the gentleman from Wisconsin, and certainly I have a high level of frustration, and many people do, because of the things that on parliamentary procedures were stricken on points of order, because…

govinfo.gov
Sep 21, 2004

Mr. Chairman, maybe people do not realize what we are actually debating. We are not debating pension plans. We are not debating conversion of pension plans from one type to another. We have before us the amendment by the gentleman from…

govinfo.gov
Jul 24, 2002

Despite my great sympathy for the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Hefley), I cannot support it. This particular bill, were it subjected to across-the-board cuts, would find that we have significant cuts and reduction…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation