Political Quotes

Don Nickles: Maybe that is in Massachusetts, I am not sure. But the Federal Government should not be insuring those million dollar…

On the recordJuly 16, 1998
Maybe that is in Massachusetts, I am not sure. But the Federal Government should not be insuring those million dollar homes. So we have a maximum limit to make sure the federal government doesn't insure million dollar homes. The bottom loan limit is $86,000 this year. Last year, it was $81,000, so it has increased. The top limit it is $170,000. So you have limits set at 95 percent of the median value of homes, but everywhere in this country is going to have at least this base limit, $86,000. Right now, current law, you can get a home Loan, insured 100 percent by the Federal Government, guaranteed by the taxpayers, in an amount equal to $86,000. In some areas, the higher price home areas, up to $170,000. The committee increased both of those limits. They increased the base amount from $86,000 to $109,000. And they also increased the top limit from $170,000 to $197,000--almost $200,000. Our amendment strikes the increase in the top limit. I hope my colleagues would say, wait a minute, $170,000 is enough for the Federal Government to insure. Shall we really go up to $200,000? Last year, it was $160,000, so, because it is tied to a percentage of the Freddie Mac conforming loan limit, it already goes up from last year's level in the top areas, from $160,000 it goes to $170,000. Isn't that enough? But, no, the committee said let's go on up to almost $200,000.
Said by
Don Nickles
Oklahoma

Editor's note · Context

Discussing limits on federal insurance for home loans during a floor debate.

Share

More from Don Nickles

Jun 2, 2004

Is there any job in the Federal Government where an individual would work 2 days a month and receive $7,000 or $5,000 worth of benefits in health care?

govinfo.gov
Sep 16, 2014

Uncle Sam is writing a check to Warren Buffett to produce windmills--$138 million.

congress.gov
Jul 15, 2004

I congratulate Senator Grassley and Senator Baucus for the way they have managed this bill. They have conducted their work in a very appropriate way. They had hearings on this bill. I want to compliment Ambassador Zoellick. Our trade…

govinfo.gov
Oct 11, 2004

If we are going to do it, we should not do it through the Tax Code. I believe it should be done through the Armed Services Committee. I have great respect for Chairman Warner and Senator Levin. Let them have hearings on it. Let them decide…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation