Political Quotes

Don Nickles: I know my State would be out of a lot of money. We offered a drug benefit that goes up to 74 percent of poverty, and we…

On the recordAugust 1, 2002
I know my State would be out of a lot of money. We offered a drug benefit that goes up to 74 percent of poverty, and we are going to put a new mandate between 74 and 150 percent of poverty. The State has to make that match. I know it is going to cost my State millions. HHS said it cost $68 million. They said the cost for the first year is over $5 billion. We did find his amendment greatly increases Medicaid costs for a lot of States. Yes, we exposed that. That happens to be factual. This was not just a Medicare expansion. It was a Medicaid expansion, and the States have to match Medicaid. Did we find it? Yes. Did we find in the original Graham proposal that the proposal limited the prescription drugs to one, up to two, drugs for therapeutic class? We did. I think it probably is one of the reasons that proposal did not pass--because it is such a limitation.
Said by
Don Nickles
Oklahoma

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the financial impact of a proposed drug benefit on states during a floor speech.

Share

More from Don Nickles

Sep 23, 2004

the pending Foreign Operations appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2005, S. 2674, as reported by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, provides $19.386 billion in discretionary budget authority and $26.728 billion discretionary outlays…

govinfo.gov
Sep 14, 2004

I will make a few comments concerning the Baucus amendment requesting $2.65 billion of drought assistance. I have two or three comments. One, it doesn't belong on this bill. This is the Homeland Security bill. This is not an agriculture…

govinfo.gov
Jul 15, 2004

I have a couple comments. Again, I compliment my colleagues, Senator Kennedy and Senator DeWine. They have been steadfast in their advocacy. Senator DeWine is right, he and Senator Kennedy introduced this a long time ago. If I am correct…

govinfo.gov
Oct 10, 2004

I am not sure it is written that way. I am not sure it is a requirement that an employer has to give the money immediately to a service man or woman. I suspect that is your intent. I don't believe that is the way the amendment is written…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation