Yesterday Senator Gramm had an amendment that said let's fund the 1998 emergencies and we will call it an emergency; we don't have to have an offset. That was the underlying bill. The underlying bill had money for defense, money for Iraq, money for Bosnia, money for the so-called emergencies--weather-related emergencies. I thought he had a good amendment. I did not speak out on the floor, and I wish I had. That was on the underlying bill, which is about $3.3 billion. Now we are looking at an amendment to expand that bill by an additional $1.6 billion. I ask the Senator from Missouri, is that correct--$1.6 billion for FEMA?
Don Nickles: “Yesterday Senator Gramm had an amendment that said let's fund the 1998 emergencies and we will call it an emergency; we…”
On the recordMarch 25, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing funding for emergencies and amendments related to the 1998 budget.
Share
More from Don Nickles
Jun 11, 2012
You would give such a tax advantage to Total, BP, Lukoil, other international oil companies.
Apr 21, 2010
The Senate is special for a couple of reasons, but amongst legislative bodies, it is really special because unlike the House and unlike most parliament procedures, members of the Senate have unlimited debate and unlimited opportunities to…
Jun 11, 2012
I do not defend 199, period. I think Congress--when you are rewriting the tax code, you should have a uniform corporate rate, not a lower rate for manufacturing.
Jun 2, 2004
If somebody is activated and they go to Afghanistan or Iraq, don't they receive full health care costs without paying the 28 percent?





