I hope we will have overwhelming bipartisan support for it, and hopefully everyone can understand what we are talking about doing. We are talking about saving Social Security. The President during his State of the Union speech says we want to save Social Security; we don't want to spend one dime of the surplus. Senator Roth is trying to save Social Security. Because we do not just save Social Security by not spending the surplus either in the form of additional outlays--frankly, the President is violating that as we speak because he wants to have a supplemental appropriations bill and doesn't want to pay for it. He is already violating what he said in the State of the Union Address. But I agree. We should save Social Security. This resolution says that we should take the surplus and allow individuals to set up personal savings accounts. I think that is the way to save Social Security. I think that is the way to fund Social Security. Right now we don't fund Social Security. It is an unfunded paying system.
Don Nickles: “I hope we will have overwhelming bipartisan support for it, and hopefully everyone can understand what we are talking…”
On the recordApril 1, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of saving Social Security and supporting a resolution for personal savings accounts.
Share
More from Don Nickles
Jun 11, 2012
We should not be giving advantages to our international competitors over our U.S.-based companies.
Apr 21, 2010
The Senate is special for a couple of reasons, but amongst legislative bodies, it is really special because unlike the House and unlike most parliament procedures, members of the Senate have unlimited debate and unlimited opportunities to…
Sep 16, 2014
The biggest economic boon to this country has been the explosion of oil and gas activity, primarily because of fracking.
Jun 11, 2012
When we reduce capital gains and corporate dividends to 15 percent, we actually raise more money for the Federal Government.





