I wish to compliment the Senator from Wyoming, Mr. Enzi, for his enrollee choice proposal. I think it is an outstanding proposal. I urge my colleagues to be in favor of it. I would also like to make a couple comments dealing with the designated decision maker. Some people are acting like this is a grand compromise, that this is going to save employers: Employers are going to be exempt now because we are going to give this decision to a third party. When I ran a company, Nickles Machine Corporation, we had a third party administrator. They handled all the administrative claims. They did a decent job. So I didn't have to do it, our company didn't have to do it. We hired them to pay the benefits, to harass the providers, to make sure that benefits were paid or weren't paid. They paid the right benefits, didn't pay the right benefits. They were hired guns to run the plan, to make the decisions, to negotiate with the hospitals, negotiate with the doctors--all those kinds of things.
Don Nickles: “I wish to compliment the Senator from Wyoming, Mr. Enzi, for his enrollee choice proposal. I think it is an outstanding…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of third party administrators in healthcare during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Don Nickles
When we reduce capital gains and corporate dividends to 15 percent, we actually raise more money for the Federal Government.
Is there any job in the Federal Government where an individual would work 2 days a month and receive $7,000 or $5,000 worth of benefits in health care?
the pending Foreign Operations appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2005, S. 2674, as reported by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, provides $19.386 billion in discretionary budget authority and $26.728 billion discretionary outlays…
If we are going to do it, we should not do it through the Tax Code. I believe it should be done through the Armed Services Committee. I have great respect for Chairman Warner and Senator Levin. Let them have hearings on it. Let them decide…





