On the recordJuly 31, 2003
to further clarify, I ask my colleague, should the inclusion of this provision be seen as a break from the longstanding tradition of Federal Government neutrality in labor- management relations?
Source
govinfo.govDon Nickles: “to further clarify, I ask my colleague, should the inclusion of this provision be seen as a break from the longstanding…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a provision on federal neutrality in labor-management relations.
Share
More from Don Nickles
Jun 11, 2012
I think for tax simplicity, you should allow every business to be able to expense certainly its wages.
Jun 11, 2012
We should not be giving advantages to our international competitors over our U.S.-based companies.
Oct 10, 2004
I am not sure it is written that way. I am not sure it is a requirement that an employer has to give the money immediately to a service man or woman. I suspect that is your intent. I don't believe that is the way the amendment is written…
Oct 11, 2004
I want to compliment Senator Grassley and Senator Baucus, and, frankly, all the conferees, for their work on this bill. There was a lot of work that went in on this bill. This bill has a lot of good provisions, and in this Senator's…
Other voices in this conversation
