If the Senator will require the Texas utility code section 39.904, goals for renewable energy is 2,000 megawatts of generating capacity. I mention this because capacity is one thing, to generate electricity is another. For wind, you need three times the facilities to actually generate because they don't operate 24 hours a day. The wind does not always blow. Capacity is less intrusive and less expensive. And factually, the amount of megawatts produced equals right now 2.6 percent of the Texas generating capacity and less than 2 percent anticipated by the year 2009. I heard my colleague say this is modeled after Texas. But it is not modeled after Texas. It did not follow Texas in any way, shape, or form. That is an editorial comment.
Don Nickles: “If the Senator will require the Texas utility code section 39.904, goals for renewable energy is 2,000 megawatts of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing renewable energy capacity and its implications during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Don Nickles
I want to compliment Senator Grassley and Senator Baucus, and, frankly, all the conferees, for their work on this bill. There was a lot of work that went in on this bill. This bill has a lot of good provisions, and in this Senator's…
I understand the Senator didn't like my first question because she is trying to give the Guard and Reserve additional compensation and additional pay but through a tax credit which goes to their employer which may take some time to get…
I am happy to debate my colleague, or any colleague, on the budget. We spent several days debating the budget. I am more than happy to debate it. I will tell my colleague that we basically have assumed a freeze in nondefense, non-homeland…
I think it would be a disastrous mistake for the Senate if you want the Senate to be a deliberative body.





