I had printed in the Record the joint tax statement that had the 5-year cost at $56 billion and had the 10-year cost at $56 billion, my point being we ought to be accurate. For some people to imply the bill we passed was $248 is factually incorrect.
Don Nickles: “I had printed in the Record the joint tax statement that had the 5-year cost at $56 billion and had the 10-year cost at…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing inaccuracies regarding the cost of a tax bill during a floor debate.
Share
More from Don Nickles
Lowering the threshold required for cloture, in my opinion, would be a mistake, because that is a threshold that almost by definition requires bipartisan involvement.
If you no longer allowed intangible drilling costs to be expensed, you would shut down the shale revolution.
I would have to look at the figures. The baseline scored by OMB was 521. The baseline scored by CBO was 477. The figure we had before us in the budget resolution, I would want to check. CBO is in the process of revising that. We use CBO…
I will make a few comments concerning the Baucus amendment requesting $2.65 billion of drought assistance. I have two or three comments. One, it doesn't belong on this bill. This is the Homeland Security bill. This is not an agriculture…





