I am wondering about all these savings. I am looking at my State. You said if the State had a prescription drug program, the Federal Government might be picking up a lot of that State program so therefore it is saving. My State doesn't have that, other than the fact we provide Medicaid prescription drugs up to 74 percent, and that is limited to three prescriptions per month. So where is the savings for my State? HHS said this is going to cost my State something like $62 million. My director of Medicaid said it is going to cost our State, and we can't afford it. There, obviously, under your proposal are some States, maybe a lot of States, that would be losers; isn't that correct? It would increase their Medicaid costs dramatically?
Don Nickles: “I am wondering about all these savings. I am looking at my State. You said if the State had a prescription drug program…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the financial implications of a prescription drug program for his state during a debate.
Share
More from Don Nickles
If we are going to do it, we should not do it through the Tax Code. I believe it should be done through the Armed Services Committee. I have great respect for Chairman Warner and Senator Levin. Let them have hearings on it. Let them decide…
I think for tax simplicity, you should allow every business to be able to expense certainly its wages.
If you no longer allowed intangible drilling costs to be expensed, you would shut down the shale revolution.
I need to know a little bit more about the amendment. The tax credit goes to the employers. Is there any guarantee that money, the tax credit--let's say $20,000 for the service man or woman-- goes to the service man or woman. How do we…





