To respond to my colleague, this year, 1997, we have domestic discretionary caps at $288 billion. What we will have to do is fund it within that amount. To answer you specifically, if you wanted to stay on your HUD baseline--you have a baseline, all the other subcommittees have a baseline--you would either have to fund it within your baseline, within your group, within your subcommittee, or if that wasn't possible, you would have to borrow from some other subcommittee, but the total would have to stay on the cap amount.
Don Nickles: “To respond to my colleague, this year, 1997, we have domestic discretionary caps at $288 billion. What we will have to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budgetary constraints and funding within domestic discretionary caps.
Share
More from Don Nickles
law makers must carefully distinguish between the need for tax credits which may operate as subsidies, compared to more favored tax deductions which are expensed as part of ordinary business operations.
I would have to look at the figures. The baseline scored by OMB was 521. The baseline scored by CBO was 477. The figure we had before us in the budget resolution, I would want to check. CBO is in the process of revising that. We use CBO…
I congratulate Senator Grassley and Senator Baucus for the way they have managed this bill. They have conducted their work in a very appropriate way. They had hearings on this bill. I want to compliment Ambassador Zoellick. Our trade…
When we reduce capital gains and corporate dividends to 15 percent, we actually raise more money for the Federal Government.





