Not just yet. My point is--and I have not even alluded to the education issue, and I am going to hand that to Senator Gregg who knows far more about education than this Senator--no matter what level we had in this resolution, I was more than confident somebody would say that is not enough for education. I have looked at the total education function we have, and it totals $97.6 billion. That does not include the additional $5 billion--yes, it does. That includes the $5 billion Senator Gregg has put in for higher education reauthorization. I looked at what we spent. That is $97 billion. In 1990, we spent $39 billion, almost three times as much. In the year 2000, we spent $49 billion. It is right at twice as much as we spent in the year 2000. We have had dramatic increases in education--dramatic increases--including the last several years. But no matter what that amount is, people are going to say that is not enough and, oh, yes, we want to increase taxes a lot more and throw a lot more money at it. I am just not sure that is the correct result we should be following. I want everybody to know this is a tax increase. I want everybody to know this is a humongous increase in this program. I have not figured the percentage.
Don Nickles: “Not just yet. My point is--and I have not even alluded to the education issue, and I am going to hand that to Senator…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing education funding and tax implications during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Don Nickles
I congratulate Senator Grassley and Senator Baucus for the way they have managed this bill. They have conducted their work in a very appropriate way. They had hearings on this bill. I want to compliment Ambassador Zoellick. Our trade…
You cannot afford to make fossil fuels' tax equal to the enormous subsidy that wind currently receives.
I have every confidence that in comparing President George Bush and Senator John Kerry, that Oklahoma will make it 10 in a row. We will vote overwhelmingly to reelect President George W. Bush as our president.
If you no longer allowed intangible drilling costs to be expensed, you would shut down the shale revolution.





