No, I will not yield. That is the unfortunate result of her amendment. It is just too bad that we bypassed the committee. I don't know why the chairman of the Finance Committee and the ranking member are not saying: Wait a minute, this might be a good proposal. Let's have a hearing on it. We will mark it up. We will consider it. We haven't done that; again, for something that involves State after State, a Supreme Court decision that will be made in probably a few months. We are going to interject ourselves with a trivial amount of debate on the floor, and we will have Senators vote on it and probably not half a dozen Senators have looked at the amendment in any detail. That is not a good way to legislate. I reserve the remainder of my time.
Don Nickles: “No, I will not yield. That is the unfortunate result of her amendment. It is just too bad that we bypassed the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legislative process and the need for hearings on an amendment.
Share
More from Don Nickles
I need to know a little bit more about the amendment. The tax credit goes to the employers. Is there any guarantee that money, the tax credit--let's say $20,000 for the service man or woman-- goes to the service man or woman. How do we…
I think it would be a disastrous mistake for the Senate if you want the Senate to be a deliberative body.
The biggest economic boon to this country has been the explosion of oil and gas activity, primarily because of fracking.
Yesterday the Senate completed action of the second of 13 appropriations bills for fiscal year 2005, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill. Although the Senate has not yet adopted a new concurrent resolution on the…





