On the recordMarch 25, 1998
It would mean that it would have to come within the total amount of money that we have on domestic discretionary spending caps. It would be in that amount, several hundred billion.
Source
govinfo.govIt would mean that it would have to come within the total amount of money that we have on domestic discretionary spending caps. It would be in that amount, several hundred billion.
Discussing domestic discretionary spending caps.
Share
More from Don Nickles
When we reduce capital gains and corporate dividends to 15 percent, we actually raise more money for the Federal Government.
I understand the Senator didn't like my first question because she is trying to give the Guard and Reserve additional compensation and additional pay but through a tax credit which goes to their employer which may take some time to get…
I think for tax simplicity, you should allow every business to be able to expense certainly its wages.
Congress passed a bad law called the Windfall Profits Tax. That motivated me to run for Senate more than anything else.