If I understood the Senator's statement, the $700 million the States would have to pick up, this is a program that will cost $121 billion next year for the Federal Government and that is growing at an unbelievable, unsustainable rate. So you are talking about a program over the next 5 years that is going to be well over $100 billion, and we are asking beneficiaries to pay $5, and in some cases the States may pick up a portion of that, maybe $700 million out of a total cost of over $100 billion. I don't find that unreasonable in any way.
Don Nickles: “If I understood the Senator's statement, the $700 million the States would have to pick up, this is a program that will…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of a federal program during Senate debate.
Share
More from Don Nickles
If we are going to do it, we should not do it through the Tax Code. I believe it should be done through the Armed Services Committee. I have great respect for Chairman Warner and Senator Levin. Let them have hearings on it. Let them decide…
You cannot afford to make fossil fuels' tax equal to the enormous subsidy that wind currently receives.
Uncle Sam is writing a check to Warren Buffett to produce windmills--$138 million.
I am not sure it is written that way. I am not sure it is a requirement that an employer has to give the money immediately to a service man or woman. I suspect that is your intent. I don't believe that is the way the amendment is written…





