I thank my colleague. Senator Dole's proposal, I believe, is directed toward States that have significant increases in growth in poverty. And my guess is--I have not studied these charts--but he talks about the growth funds for States that have significant increases in poverty. Yours maybe is a little broader distribution. I will tell my colleagues that there is a dispute on both sides of the aisle. This is probably not a partisan amendment as such because people wrestle with distribution formulas, and trying to come up with most equitable formula is not always the easiest thing to do, particularly if they have a lot of inequities in past distribution formulas which we have had with different programs. But I, again, want to thank the Senator from California for offering her amendment and sending it to the desk. Does the Senator also have another amendment?
Don Nickles: “I thank my colleague. Senator Dole's proposal, I believe, is directed toward States that have significant increases in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing Senator Dole's proposal related to poverty growth and distribution formulas.
Share
More from Don Nickles
If we are going to do it, we should not do it through the Tax Code. I believe it should be done through the Armed Services Committee. I have great respect for Chairman Warner and Senator Levin. Let them have hearings on it. Let them decide…
I would have to look at the figures. The baseline scored by OMB was 521. The baseline scored by CBO was 477. The figure we had before us in the budget resolution, I would want to check. CBO is in the process of revising that. We use CBO…
When we reduce capital gains and corporate dividends to 15 percent, we actually raise more money for the Federal Government.
the pending Foreign Operations appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2005, S. 2674, as reported by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, provides $19.386 billion in discretionary budget authority and $26.728 billion discretionary outlays…





