people are entitled to their own opinion, but they are not entitled to their own facts. The tripartisan bill--and I will let Senator Grassley and Senator Breaux and others defend it--says for people with incomes less than 150 percent of poverty, the Federal Government, or this new plan, will pick up 95 percent of the drug--95 percent. Under the Democrat proposal, if you do not have the Government-chosen plan or prescription drug, you get zero. Zero. Not 9 percent, not 50 percent. The chart the Senator from Iowa has is incorrect. Under the basic plan, if you have an income above 150 percent of poverty--in other words, above $20,000 for a couple--the Federal Government picks up half the prescription drug cost up to $3,450--half, 50 percent--and you choose your drug, not the Government choosing the drug. There is a big basic difference in this plan. You get to choose the drugs, not the Federal Government.
Don Nickles: “people are entitled to their own opinion, but they are not entitled to their own facts. The tripartisan bill--and I will…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the differences between a tripartisan bill and a Democrat proposal on prescription drug coverage.
Share
More from Don Nickles
I have every confidence that in comparing President George Bush and Senator John Kerry, that Oklahoma will make it 10 in a row. We will vote overwhelmingly to reelect President George W. Bush as our president.
I have absolutely loved working in the Senate. The Senate is a great institution. It is one of the true pillars of democracy in the world, one which people look to with great respect and admiration. I have always been proud to be called a…
I think for tax simplicity, you should allow every business to be able to expense certainly its wages.
If you no longer allowed intangible drilling costs to be expensed, you would shut down the shale revolution.





