I also oppose this conference report. Madam President, it is difficult to find something that 8 in 10 Americans agree upon. But, a poll released this week shows that 79 percent of the public believe government wastes a lot of the money they pay in taxes. This poll was not taken by a conservative Republican, but by the President's own pollster, Stanley Greenberg. Today, we have a bill before us which says to the American people, ``we don't care about fiscal restraint, and we don't care about your tax dollars.'' Why do I make this claim? Because a simple modicum of fiscal restraint in the School-to-Work program, which is now before us, passed the Senate and was stripped in conference. In February we spent some time debating and amending President Clinton's School-to-Work Program. I spoke in opposition to this legislation at that time, and as the conference report comes before the Senate today I rise to oppose it as well. When the bill was originally reported, it gave a blank check for the program by authorizing such sums as necessary. I was pleased that the Senate accepted my amendment to remove this blank check and replace it with authorization levels in the President's--I repeat, the President's--fiscal year 1995 budget. My amendment authorized $1.65 billion over 5 years for the School-to-Work Program. However, for reasons I cannot fathom my amendment was dropped from the conference report we are considering here today.
Don Nickles: “I also oppose this conference report. Madam President, it is difficult to find something that 8 in 10 Americans agree…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the conference report on the School-to-Work program during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Don Nickles
You cannot afford to make fossil fuels' tax equal to the enormous subsidy that wind currently receives.
law makers must carefully distinguish between the need for tax credits which may operate as subsidies, compared to more favored tax deductions which are expensed as part of ordinary business operations.
I have a couple comments. Again, I compliment my colleagues, Senator Kennedy and Senator DeWine. They have been steadfast in their advocacy. Senator DeWine is right, he and Senator Kennedy introduced this a long time ago. If I am correct…
I think it would be a disastrous mistake for the Senate if you want the Senate to be a deliberative body.





