to summarize again for the benefit of my colleagues, effective July 1, if we do not change this current--I started to say ``law,'' but this is not a law. The IRS came up with a regulation. We passed a law. Congress passed a law that says we want to encourage electronic fund transfers of payroll taxes. A good idea. It makes sense. It will work for a lot of people. IRS, to implement this, and maybe with some direction of Congress-- Congress said put most of the taxpayers in. The IRS did so, and then they came up with a 10-percent penalty. That is a big inducement, encouragement. Congress did not put on the 10-percent penalty; the IRS did--it puts a gun to the taxpayer's head--and then said, ``You have to do this.'' Then they said, ``This is not too much of a challenge for bigger employers.'' As a matter of fact, the current requirement, the threshold is $47 million of payroll taxes. If you have payroll taxes of $47 million, that is a big operation. And they are doing that now. That actually applies to 1,500 taxpayers in the country today. The next threshold level drops from $47 million to $50,000. Now you are talking about a lot of companies. You are talking about a lot of businesses. You do not have to be very big to have payroll taxes of $50,000. You might have total payroll of a quarter of a million or $300,000. That deadline is July 1. It was to be January 1. We postponed it for 6 months.
Don Nickles: “to summarize again for the benefit of my colleagues, effective July 1, if we do not change this current--I started to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing IRS regulations on electronic fund transfers of payroll taxes and associated penalties.
Share
More from Don Nickles
I do not defend 199, period. I think Congress--when you are rewriting the tax code, you should have a uniform corporate rate, not a lower rate for manufacturing.
I will make a few comments concerning the Baucus amendment requesting $2.65 billion of drought assistance. I have two or three comments. One, it doesn't belong on this bill. This is the Homeland Security bill. This is not an agriculture…
If somebody is activated and they go to Afghanistan or Iraq, don't they receive full health care costs without paying the 28 percent?
I think for tax simplicity, you should allow every business to be able to expense certainly its wages.





