I agree that the pending transportation bill is not the place to consider budget enforcement provisions within the Budget Committee's jurisdiction. Even though the budget enforcement provisions in this bill are meaningless in the absence of other process measures, I did not support their inclusion. Enacting statutory budget enforcement this year will require bipartisan cooperation, and the most appropriate way to ensure that is to consider these issues through the regular order. I will work closely with the Senator from North Dakota to make sure all Senate Budget Committee members have an opportunity to provide input on these issues.
Don Nickles: “I agree that the pending transportation bill is not the place to consider budget enforcement provisions within the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the inclusion of budget enforcement provisions in the transportation bill.
Share
More from Don Nickles
I would have to look at the figures. The baseline scored by OMB was 521. The baseline scored by CBO was 477. The figure we had before us in the budget resolution, I would want to check. CBO is in the process of revising that. We use CBO…
I think it would be a disastrous mistake for the Senate if you want the Senate to be a deliberative body.
I am not sure it is written that way. I am not sure it is a requirement that an employer has to give the money immediately to a service man or woman. I suspect that is your intent. I don't believe that is the way the amendment is written…
the pending Foreign Operations appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2005, S. 2674, as reported by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, provides $19.386 billion in discretionary budget authority and $26.728 billion discretionary outlays…





