To respond to my colleague, we are talking about so much, not per case, but per attorney. We didn't limit the number of attorneys. We just didn't want to be in a situation where a U.S. attorney is hiring additional counsel and to have the defense counsel say, ``Hey, we can pay three or four times more. Come fight on our side of the case.'' Right now, in the case of the Oklahoma City bombing case, the defense attorneys made--I am not talking about expenses--they individually made probably three or four times as much as U.S. attorneys. I think that is inequitable. I am talking about what they receive in take-home pay, per attorney.
Don Nickles: “To respond to my colleague, we are talking about so much, not per case, but per attorney. We didn't limit the number of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing compensation disparities between U.S. attorneys and defense attorneys.
Share
More from Don Nickles
This happens to be--the shale gas revolution, as well as the oil revolution, is one of the best things that has happened in this country economically in years.
I will make a few comments concerning the Baucus amendment requesting $2.65 billion of drought assistance. I have two or three comments. One, it doesn't belong on this bill. This is the Homeland Security bill. This is not an agriculture…
If somebody is activated and they go to Afghanistan or Iraq, don't they receive full health care costs without paying the 28 percent?
I have heard some statements where people are insinuating that American combat personnel are getting gypped by this bill. That is false. We are giving them a benefit they didn't have before. We are saying they can use combat pay in…





