I will be happy to tell my colleague from Arizona that he makes a good point but he is absolutely wrong. What the industry agreed to, according to the settlement, is that they would pay $80 million per point of noncompliance, up to a total of $2 billion. What we have before us is two surveys, penalties up to $4.4 billion, and an amendment to go to $7.7 billion. Does my colleague from Arizona realize there is a difference between $7.7 billion and $2 billion? and that $5.5 of this new penalty is product-specific? and the industry did not agree to a product-specific penalty? These provisions were not in the industry settlement, as I am reading it right now.
Don Nickles: “I will be happy to tell my colleague from Arizona that he makes a good point but he is absolutely wrong. What the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing discrepancies in penalties related to an industry settlement.
Share
More from Don Nickles
You cannot afford to make fossil fuels' tax equal to the enormous subsidy that wind currently receives.
the pending Foreign Operations appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2005, S. 2674, as reported by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, provides $19.386 billion in discretionary budget authority and $26.728 billion discretionary outlays…
If we are going to do it, we should not do it through the Tax Code. I believe it should be done through the Armed Services Committee. I have great respect for Chairman Warner and Senator Levin. Let them have hearings on it. Let them decide…
I have every confidence that in comparing President George Bush and Senator John Kerry, that Oklahoma will make it 10 in a row. We will vote overwhelmingly to reelect President George W. Bush as our president.





