I wish to congratulate and compliment my friend and colleague from Mississippi for this amendment. I just watched and listened to some of the debate. A lot of people have attacked this amendment and criticized this amendment. Of course, they have that right to do so. But I think it is important to see what this amendment does. This amendment expands on the amendment, the so-called Exon-Grassley amendment, which cut discretionary spending $26 billion. Some people said we cannot afford to do that. This amendment adds $20 billion in mandatory spending cuts in the entitlement section. A lot of that will be done in 1999. I think we can afford to do both. I am amazed. I look at the combination, that is $46 billion in outlay reductions over the next 5 years. Not $46 billion, I might mention to my colleague from Mississippi, not $46 billion next year. Next year we are going to spend over $1.5 trillion. That is $1,500 billion. If you are going to cut $46 billion in 1995 out of $1,500 billion, that might be something. That would be about 3 percent. But we are not doing that in 1995. We are not doing it in 1996. As a matter of fact you have to add all 5 years, and if you add up all 5 years, we are going to spend over $8 trillion--$8 trillion. There are 12 zeros behind a trillion. If we agree to the amendment of the Senator from Mississippi, we are talking about $46 billion. It is not even a percent, not even a half percent.
Don Nickles: “I wish to congratulate and compliment my friend and colleague from Mississippi for this amendment. I just watched and…”
On the recordMarch 23, 1994
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to spending cuts during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Don Nickles
Nov 19, 2004
I have absolutely loved working in the Senate. The Senate is a great institution. It is one of the true pillars of democracy in the world, one which people look to with great respect and admiration. I have always been proud to be called a…
Sep 16, 2014
The administration's proposal would dramatically scale down the activity in the oil patch.
Oct 11, 2004
If we are going to do it, we should not do it through the Tax Code. I believe it should be done through the Armed Services Committee. I have great respect for Chairman Warner and Senator Levin. Let them have hearings on it. Let them decide…





