first, I will make a couple comments concerning those made by some of our Democratic colleagues who said they want to bring up the Patients' Bill of Rights. We have offered throughout the month of July to bring up the Patients' Bill of Rights. I will make a unanimous consent request to do it again. Unfortunately, our Democratic colleagues haven't been able to take yes for an answer. In other words, I think they want to debate an issue, discuss an issue, have unlimited amendments, and we are not going to give them that. We only have 22 days left in this legislative session. We tried to get this up and considered and done in July. They wouldn't accept that request. In just a moment, I am going to make a unanimous consent request to bring it up with limited amendments. I will tell my colleagues, it will be three amendments a side. You can design any amendment any way you want. You can offer your proposal in any way that you want. We are going to give you an up-or-down vote on your proposal; we are going to have an up-or-down vote on our proposal. That is going to be in my request. You would have the right to do three amendments; we would have the right to do three amendments. It is the same request that we made in July. If you want this issue to be considered and passed, that is the way to do it. If you want to say we want to have this issue on the floor all month, as was the unanimous consent request made by the minority leader, that is not going to happen.
Don Nickles: “first, I will make a couple comments concerning those made by some of our Democratic colleagues who said they want to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Patients' Bill of Rights and unanimous consent requests during legislative session.
Share
More from Don Nickles
I will make a few comments concerning the Baucus amendment requesting $2.65 billion of drought assistance. I have two or three comments. One, it doesn't belong on this bill. This is the Homeland Security bill. This is not an agriculture…
I am not sure it is written that way. I am not sure it is a requirement that an employer has to give the money immediately to a service man or woman. I suspect that is your intent. I don't believe that is the way the amendment is written…
We should not be giving advantages to our international competitors over our U.S.-based companies.
I was the principal sponsor of the Defense of Marriage Act, which passed and was signed into law by President Clinton in 1996. I heard my very good friend from Minnesota, Senator Dayton, mention that this is about politics, and I wanted to…





