Political Quotes

Don Nickles: I agree totally. And I also tell my colleague and friend from Texas, I wasn't part of the tobacco companies' deal. I am…

On the recordMay 21, 1998
I agree totally. And I also tell my colleague and friend from Texas, I wasn't part of the tobacco companies' deal. I am part of the Finance Committee. And I think if we are going to legislate on taxes, we ought to do it right. This is not the right way to tax. I will also tell my colleague from Texas, I have heard people say the tobacco industry is confident they can challenge these look-back assessments and win in court and have it thrown out as unconstitutional. Regardless of the constitutional argument, I say this is a crummy way to tax. I don't want to give the Secretary of the Treasury the authority to conduct a poll and then determine that the poll is accurate, proper, correct for purposes of this act, and be able to make assessments. Under the agreement the tobacco companies agreed to, it was up to $2 billion. Under the bill that came out of the Commerce Committee, it was $3.96 billion. Under the bill the administration wrote and introduced on Monday, it came up to $4.4 billion. And on the amendment we have pending now, it is $7.7 billion, also indexed for inflation. The industry did not sign off on any $7.7 billion look-back.
Said by
Don Nickles
Oklahoma

Editor's note · Context

Discussing concerns over taxation related to tobacco companies during a Finance Committee debate.

Share

More from Don Nickles

Jun 11, 2012

I think for tax simplicity, you should allow every business to be able to expense certainly its wages.

congress.gov
Oct 10, 2004

I understand the Senator didn't like my first question because she is trying to give the Guard and Reserve additional compensation and additional pay but through a tax credit which goes to their employer which may take some time to get…

govinfo.gov
Jun 11, 2012

If you no longer allowed intangible drilling costs to be expensed, you would shut down the shale revolution.

congress.gov
Sep 14, 2004

I will make a few comments concerning the Baucus amendment requesting $2.65 billion of drought assistance. I have two or three comments. One, it doesn't belong on this bill. This is the Homeland Security bill. This is not an agriculture…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation