He says the cost of this provision in 5 years is estimated at $8.7 billion, and over 10 years, $18.4 billion. That is a lot of money. We are going to say companies get a 40-percent tax credit if they do something in the realm of safety, which one could almost drive a truck through anything and call it safety. I am not a big fan of tax credits anyway, but that is beside the point. This is a very expensive provision, one, in my opinion, that has not been well thought out, one that is enormously expensive, one that is not paid for. A week before last, we had votes saying we should be paying for these new spending proposals and tax cuts. Well, this is a big tax cut that is not paid for. Frankly, it is a big loophole that is not paid for. It also causes other little constitutional problems. We have a Constitution that says all revenue measures have to originate in the House. We do not have a tax bill before us. This did not originate in the House of Representatives. I know my colleagues very well in the House. I respect them and I know they will blue-slip this if this amendment is passed because this would turn this into a tax bill. So this amendment would kill this bill. Our colleagues in the House want to pass the bill as it is. I hope that a majority in the Senate want to pass the bill as it is. As it is, this amendment does a couple of things.…
Don Nickles: “He says the cost of this provision in 5 years is estimated at $8.7 billion, and over 10 years, $18.4 billion. That is a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications and constitutional issues of a proposed tax credit amendment.
Share
More from Don Nickles
I would have to look at the figures. The baseline scored by OMB was 521. The baseline scored by CBO was 477. The figure we had before us in the budget resolution, I would want to check. CBO is in the process of revising that. We use CBO…
Uncle Sam is writing a check to Warren Buffett to produce windmills--$138 million.
If you no longer allowed intangible drilling costs to be expensed, you would shut down the shale revolution.
I have a couple comments. Again, I compliment my colleagues, Senator Kennedy and Senator DeWine. They have been steadfast in their advocacy. Senator DeWine is right, he and Senator Kennedy introduced this a long time ago. If I am correct…





