Unlike the House bill, the Senate bill creates over $1.2 billion in new mandatory spending, offset by administrative savings from the food stamp program. Programs to be funded with those savings, however worthy, should not take precedence over feeding hungry people. The food stamp program has already been drastically cut, and it is only fair that a substantial share of any food stamp savings should be reinvested in addressing the critical food and nutrition needs, in particular restoring food stamp benefits to vulnerable groups of legal immigrants, including the elderly, the handicapped and families with children.
Tony Hall: “Unlike the House bill, the Senate bill creates over $1.2 billion in new mandatory spending, offset by administrative…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about food stamp funding during a debate on a Senate bill.
Share
More from Tony Hall
The bill expresses the support of Congress for expanding the number of members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It recognizes the importance of admitting seven specific nations in Central and Eastern Europe. This legislation is…
If we compare ourselves with the 17 major nations of the world, we rank seventeenth in our appropriation to foreign aid. We need to do better. We need to quit running from this issue. We need to stand up and support it. There are a lot of…
The substantive part of the bill which they are sending back to the Senate has to do with blood diamonds. Blood diamonds are diamonds that are used to really fund wars in Africa, particularly in Sierra Leone, in Angola, and in the Congo…
I think the longer that we keep this piece of legislation from passing in this Congress the more kinds of civil wars we are going to see in Africa; and it is just horrendous, when you see these people, how they have had their lives…





