I think the words in that Executive Order are very encouraging

My understanding is President Obama revoked that Executive Order, and I do not understand why.

Don't you think a better accounting of the actual costs would help to actually, again, translate that good language into something that is meaningful?

I think it is only logical that to the extent you have concerns, which I understand, and you mentioned political and legal concerns, I think it is the legal concerns that would constrain you.

I would tell you that if you look at what, again, courts are already, again, applying the arbitrary and capricious standard to very complex, scientific, technical analysis.

It gets into this issue of strengthening the economic impact analysis.

I do feel strongly that having that judicial review would have a significant impact on how the agencies went about their work.

this afternoon, after a few days of great anticipation, the President laid out his version for long-term deficit reduction and dealing with our long-term debt. Now that we have heard from him, I am afraid we are left with more questions…

We need regulatory reform. We need regulatory freedom.

I certainly found that when I was at OMB, an end run around what would normally be the deliberative process and the give and take that you get in a notice and comment rulemaking process.

I believe this PAYGO process would actually force more conversations about alternatives to necessary regulations.

I do not think courts are expert in economic analysis.