My amendment increases by $5 million the minimal level of funding for the International Trade Administration in the amount that they must devote to cracking down on unfair Chinese trade practices. We must ensure that U.S. manufacturers and…
Mike Turner
The Public Record
Mike Turner is a Republican member of the United States House of Representatives, representing Ohio's 10th congressional district since 2003. He has been involved in various committees, focusing primarily on national security and defense issues. Throughout his tenure, Turner has advocated for policies aimed at strengthening the military and enhancing the safety of American citizens. His work has included addressing concerns related to defense spending and military readiness.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 3, line 15, after the dollar amount, insert ``(increased by $5,000,000)''. The Acting CHAIR. The…
This amendment would make a technical correction to the definition sections of this bill to ensure that U.S. cybersecurity policies remain consistent for protections against threats to our government and private sector networks. This…
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 15, line 7, insert ``deny access to or'' before ``degrade''. Page 15, line 20, insert ``deny access to…
Please provide a final estimate cost figure for the CMRR-NF facility, based upon where the design is at right now.
Both the President and NNSA and DOD have identified it with respect to the modernization plan as being necessary and essential, not merely desirable.
I do have an opportunity to make my voice heard in both the Pentagon and the White House in this particular area, and I do, and I am listened to, and I think the sustained commitment over time to the people is what is the most important…
The issue of the timing of modernization to the adoption of New START Treaty was expressly stated by the Senate in Condition Nine and was expressly concurred with by the President.
Good afternoon. We will call to order the hearing for the Strategic Forces Subcommittee.
So is your answer basically then, and I am sorry, obviously these are very complex issues to compare, is it a workforce capacity issue?
If we have a continuing resolution for the beginning of FY 2013, will NNSA recommend to the President that he seek an 'anomaly' for NNSA--or any individual NNSA programs?
What our focus is on, which is why there is congressional oversight, are the things that aren't happening, why they aren't happening, and when they are going to happen.
This committee, subcommittee, has historically on a bipartisan basis unanimously supported the necessity, not just the desirability, but the necessity of CMRR, the UPF, and the life extension programs.
How much will this alternate plan cost in relation to what CMRR was expected to cost?
I mean, it obviously, if that--if you are going to have to be fixing it, I would assume that it is an error.
Do you still anticipate building CMRR-NF, with work commencing in 5 years? How much more expensive will CMFF-NF be then vs. if we built it now?
The Budget Control Act does not dictate any reductions that we are dealing with in this subcommittee with respect to NNSA or nuclear modernization.
What is the cost of the alternative plutonium strategy, including modifications to PF-4 and RLUOB, shipping material to DAF and Superblock, cleaning out the PF-4 vault, conducting the pit reuse study, etc.?
I must ask, being a gentleman of Ohio, if you would please not refer to an Ohio replacement. It is the Ohio class sub replacement, and it would make me feel more comfortable as we go through this.
almost every time we see that you stress to this subcommittee how important the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement, CMRR, Facility is and how the capabilities it will provide are critical to sustaining a stockpile.
Throughout all of my questions and my opening statement and I think concerns that you have heard from members of the panel has been the issue of the abandonment by the Administration in this budgetary request of the commitment to the…
Now, Administrator D'Agostino, you have the benefit of having appeared before this subcommittee seven times starting in 2006 when you were Deputy NNSA Administrator.
The stimulus I voted and many people in this room voted against, is because the American people actually believe that when taxpayers' dollars are being spent that debt is being created.
This is an administration that believes that when government spending is occurring, when taxpayers' dollars are being spent, that jobs are being created.





