Simply said, no Member of Congress should vote for $270 billion in Medicare cuts believing that reductions of this size have been recommended by the Medicare trustees or that such reductions are needed now to prevent an imminent funding crisis. That would be factually incorrect. I just might add the trustees in fact did say that $90 billion was more in the nature of what was needed over a period of time to look at the solvency issue.
Martin Hoke: “Simply said, no Member of Congress should vote for $270 billion in Medicare cuts believing that reductions of this size…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing Medicare cuts and misrepresentations regarding trustee recommendations.
Share
More from Martin Hoke
Mr. Speaker, we did a threefer this week. A threefer. First of all, we passed welfare reform that fundamentally changes the welfare system, and it ways no more something for nothing. We are not going to condemn people to a cycle of…
I happen to have the privilege of living in what is known as the frost belt where one of these research planes does deicing research in northeastern Ohio. Somehow, somebody missed the point about sending deicing research aircraft to the…
While there is a need to address the financial stability of Medicare, the congressional majority's claims are simply mistaken. As trustees of the Part A Medicare Trust Fund which is the subject of the current debate, and authors of an…
for the past 8 months liberal interest groups have been advertising in my district, and we have heard a drum beat of the same message here in the Congress from the minority, where millions of dollars have been spent trying to scare seniors…





