Simply said, no Member of Congress should vote for $270 billion in Medicare cuts believing that reductions of this size have been recommended by the Medicare trustees or that such reductions are needed now to prevent an imminent funding crisis. That would be factually incorrect. I just might add the trustees in fact did say that $90 billion was more in the nature of what was needed over a period of time to look at the solvency issue.
Martin Hoke: “Simply said, no Member of Congress should vote for $270 billion in Medicare cuts believing that reductions of this size…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing Medicare cuts and misrepresentations regarding trustee recommendations.
Share
More from Martin Hoke
I really appreciate that. As the gentleman knows, I am the author of H.R. 2483, the Defend America Act. I appreciate the gentleman's support on that, and especially in light of this veiled threat from Chinese officials. I think it is…
While there is a need to address the financial stability of Medicare, the congressional majority's claims are simply mistaken. As trustees of the Part A Medicare Trust Fund which is the subject of the current debate, and authors of an…
I happen to have the privilege of living in what is known as the frost belt where one of these research planes does deicing research in northeastern Ohio. Somehow, somebody missed the point about sending deicing research aircraft to the…
Just like a private citizen, just like you and I, just like somebody in the private sector. You are not going to be stuck in a 1965 plan and not have any other options or places to go.





