As the Ethics Committee prepares its recommendations to the full House, it should release only the information which the committee agrees is relevant and necessary to support its findings. To ask a Member, any Member, to also respond in the court of public opinion to allegations, rumors and innuendo not deemed worthy of charge by the Committee would be totally unfair and a perversion of the process. Especially in a time of press sensationalism. Public release of material not germane to formal Committee action would be similar to the process used during the Joe McCarthy era: Ignore the discipline of due process and firm evidence, and dump unproven allegations out in public and let the ensuing publicity destroy the person's reputation and career.
Martin Hoke: “As the Ethics Committee prepares its recommendations to the full House, it should release only the information which the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the fairness of the Ethics Committee's process regarding public allegations.
Share
More from Martin Hoke
In 1950, the average income family in America had 2 percent of its income paid to the Government in taxes. In 1996, that number has gone up to about 25 percent. We have had, you could say, a 12 times, a 1,200 percent increase in the…
I really appreciate that. As the gentleman knows, I am the author of H.R. 2483, the Defend America Act. I appreciate the gentleman's support on that, and especially in light of this veiled threat from Chinese officials. I think it is…
Who has written this letter now in a very, very political way. He has decided to jump in politically because he sees that apparently the President's approach to this, which had been, frankly, very evenhanded, which had recognized that…
The truth is that every reasonable person in this body, every responsible person who has examined the situation, every responsible person in the administration, every person who is looking at it in a dispassionate and temperate way, not…





