Some schools are actually requiring parents to place their child on drugs in order to attend school. This is wrong. My provision is not anti-school. It is not anti-teacher. It is not anti-medication. This provision is pro-children and pro-parents. This provision simply protects our children from unnecessary medication and it provides parents the decision-making power that they should have for their child's safety. I urge my colleagues to support this and other sensible provisions contained in H.R. 1350.
Joseph T. Burns: “Some schools are actually requiring parents to place their child on drugs in order to attend school. This is wrong. My…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Improving Results for Children With Disabilities Act of 2003 and its provisions.
Share
More from Joseph T. Burns
That is correct. This directs the Census Bureau to take a study and get the true impact of how counting illegal aliens affects the reapportionment in the House of Representatives.
I will be happy to consider the Senator's request should funding become available.
If all of the money is not used for the set-top box and there is money left over, yes, it does go to debt reduction, but isn't it also earmarked in there for first responders and spectrum? Did we not talk about them? Basically that is why…
I am very supportive of the Senator from Nebraska on this issue. I wish we could have gotten a vote and not have to deal with a point of order. I don't think the fires we have had in Montana and the dry weather we have had in Montana yield…





