I want to say one thing, and that is that the general premise of this bill is in the right direction. The emphasis is on renewables and things we can do that are good for the environment and still produce energy. All this other chaff and dust that has been kicked up around it that gives opponents such a move in the right direction can be dealt with later, but the general premise of the bill is good because a balance is there in the areas in which most of us really believe. Let us not take our eye off the ball. Let us move it on down the field under a premise of developing a policy and a way to not only deal with the environment but also produce energy. I tell my colleagues, we can deal with those things that are objectionable at a later time, but we must move in this kind of a direction.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the merits of a bill focused on renewable energy and environmental policy.
Share
More from Joseph T. Burns
It is pretty clear to me, and I think it was pretty clear to the judge and most other folks who look at this that the State Constitution is pretty specific that only citizens are entitled to vote.
It is about fairness. It is about a fair, competitive, global environment. And right now the current income tax system is putting us at a severe disadvantage. The fair tax would relieve that, make that playing field more level, and more…
Absolutely. So what we are going to do is tax only those people who make over $4,000, a king's ransom at that time, and unfortunately, at least for the Congress, they were trying to use the existing Constitution. Because of its vagueness…
there are still Members in this body that do not understand what marriage penalty relief is about. They only understand tax and spending increases, for any reason regardless of whether any particular tax may be unfair or inefficient or…





