The President held that a case was not presented in which, under the constitution and the laws, he was justified in using the army of the United States in deciding a purely local election contest.
John Sherman: “The President held that a case was not presented in which, under the constitution and the laws, he was justified in…”
On the record
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Sherman articulates the constitutional limitations on presidential intervention in state election disputes.
Share
More from John Sherman
The Union already embraces discordant elements enough without adding others.
The life of a civilian is in what he says or writes, that of a soldier in what he does.
If my life is prolonged I will do all I can to add to the strength and prosperity of the United States, but nothing to extend its limits or to add new dangers by acquisition of foreign territory.
Proud of Ohio, of its history and people, willing at all times to sound its praise in the sisterhood of states, yet, according to my convictions, the United States is entitled to my allegiance, and all parts of it should receive equal care…





