The tariff law was not, therefore, consistent with any general principle, but it was nearer so than the one in force before its passage, and the necessity of passing some law that would reduce taxation was so imperative that the differences between the two Houses were readily compromised.
John Sherman: “The tariff law was not, therefore, consistent with any general principle, but it was nearer so than the one in force…”
On the record
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Sherman reflects on the compromises made in passing the tariff law to reduce taxation.
Share
More from John Sherman
Our family of states is already large enough to create embarrassment in the Senate, and a republic should not hold dependent provinces or possessions.
Though my grateful thanks are due to them and have been often expressed, yet I have felt, as they do, that my duty was to the whole country.
Proud of Ohio, of its history and people, willing at all times to sound its praise in the sisterhood of states, yet, according to my convictions, the United States is entitled to my allegiance, and all parts of it should receive equal care…
The Union already embraces discordant elements enough without adding others.





